In a recent article in Harper’s Magazine, freelance writer Ken Silverstein investigates Cambodian sweatshops. He uncovers several major American t-shirt distributers that utilize the services of impoverished Cambodian women; two such corporations are Wal-Mart and Aeropostale.
The subtitle of the article, “The human cost of a two-dollar T-shirt,” caught my interest because I had recently bought a slew of two-dollar t-shirts that I had planned to create original designs for and sell on this website. However, I abandoned the concept in favor of outsourcing to a t-shirt design specialist that could produce higher quality t-shirts with my designs on them.
These t-shirts can be found here.
Anyway, I am not surprised that t-shirts are produced in such a way. This was a big issue in the ‘90s with Nike, and to this day, I rarely buy Nike products for that reason. According to Silverstein’s article, however, Nike has since taken measures to improve the working conditions in third-world sweatshops. In all honesty–if you didn’t already know–the damage has already been done, as the co-founder of Nike, Phil Knight, is one of the 50 richest men in the world today.
The other key piece of information that Silverstein’s article unveiled was his estimates of the sheer profits made annually off each employee. Exploiting cheap labor, paying bare-minimum prices for the products produced, and selling those sweatshop products to Americans with ridiculous markups makes major profits for clothing retailers.
Silverstein estimates in his article that each sweatshop employee produces $195,000 in sales per year. Each factory employee’s gross pay is around $750 per year, and his estimate assumes that the retailers will sell each product for roughly $25 per piece.
People who regularly shop in Branson realize that clothes are generally priced less at Aeropostale than Wal-Mart. One reason is Aeropostal’s retail outlet in the Tanger Mall which sells excess inventory from the previous year. Often times you can find t-shirts on sale in Aeropostale for under $10. Such sales keep Aeropostale’s profit margin on sweatshop t-shirts sold in Branson at a reasonable level.
However, Wal-Mart is a different story. Because of Wal-Mart’s “everyday low prices,” one should not expect to find t-shirts below $10. Unlike Aeropostale, Wal-Mart has consistent prices, and often times their supposed “sales” are nothing more than sales promotions. Wal-Mart marks their t-shirts down from the “retail” value of $18-25, but their prices never go below the competitive t-shirt prices of non-sweatshop or American-made t-shirt products. Realistically, Wal-Mart’s prices are not competitive with Aeropostale’s in many cases, so consumers should understand that Wal-Mart is making massive profits from selling such clothing.
Beside that fact that Wal-Mart is pulling the wool over the eyes of its customers, it should also be considered who Wal-Mart’s core clothing customer base is.
Wal-Mart began in Bentonville, Arkansas and quickly expanded all over the world within a few decades. People like Gretchen Wilson, the popular country music singer, have endorsed Wal-Mart as being a cheap place to buy clothing.
In Wilson’s “Redneck Woman,” she states:
Victoria’s Secret,
Well their stuff’s real nice,
Oh but I can buy the same damn thing,
On a Wal-Mart shelf half price.
It seems that people in and around the Bible Belt have long believed Wal-Mart to be a place of low prices in terms of clothing. Such a case is a half-truth at best. Many Christians within the Bible Belt inadvertently endorse clothing sweatshops and the perpetual impoverishment of third-world countries like Cambodia, whose children are often sold into prostitution to put food on the table of their families, by purchasing average-priced clothing from Wal-Mart.
Silverstein’s article also takes note of the abundance of Christian charity groups and underage prostitutes in Cambodia, but his article does not directly suggest that Wal-Mart is responsible for Cambodia’s impoverishment.
My suggestion to those not-so-wealthy Bible Belt citizens, who might believe that they have nothing to give to charity, is that you make a difference by not buying your clothing from Wal-Mart, Target, or JC Penney (all mentioned in Silverstein’s article), and start buying your clothing from outlet stores such as Aeropostale, that do not consistently overcharge for sweatshop goods. Realistically, making an effort to keep your money out of the hands of companies that exploit Cambodians may be the best thing you can do for the poor this season.
Tags: Aeropostale, Sweatshops, Wal-Mart
I always am conflicted about these things. Wal-Mart tends to have convenience and low prices and those who go to Wal-Mart tend to be those with a low-income. Also, although sweat shops are horrible, without a coordinated effort, things will never change. People often work at sweat shops because their country provides no other option. Although the sweatshops are bad, it is better than having children starve to death on a massive scale.
Thanks for the comment phil. I think sweat shops, although highly exploitive, are beneficial to people in Cambodia. Those who work in the factories tend to live better than those who do not in Cambodia. However, if the cost of producing a product is low, that price should be reflected in the prices Americans pay for the product. I think people should be mindful of how much they pay for products made in such countries, as to not encourage the exploitation of cheap labor. In that sense, I agree with your comment. Thanks again.
Great Article! Thanks!
Informative post! I Googled around for this… I came across your site!
Anyway, would you mind if I posted a return link from my blog site to your blog site?
Thank you beverage manufacturer. I encourage linking…you don’t even have to ask.
Arrg, my mouse got jammed. What I was about to say, was that this is a terrific post. Very insightful and informative at the same time.
Your flexibility on this matter creates freedom for thinking out loud and enables everyone to share their opinion.
Great post! Can I use part of your post on my site with a linkback to you? Thanks
Beneficial? I’m tired of this bullshit dichotomy, false-cause fallaciousness. They survived on an agricultural and local economy before the factories–to assume that without them they would “starve to death on a massive scale” without our humble West industrial capitalism is not only presumptive, but egoistic to an asinine scale. If anything they are starving BECAUSE they’ve been pulled from the fields to stitch your shoes for 20 cents an hour.
While I approve the tone of this blog, it rests its opinion on false presumptions and arrogant processes. Slave-wages are slave-wages, whether you stitch your shirt for Aeropostale or for Wal-Mart.
I enjoy reading what you happen to be considering next, simply because your blog is a nice read, you’re writing with passion.